Yes they were all on 60 day DL.1 was on the 60 day to end the season and then tried 2 15 day stints at the start off the next season.(same injury just not recovered)
1 went from 81 to 78,1 from 82 to 78 and 1 from 78 to 74 after their recoveries.

"Plenty of pitcher have surgeries in real life and by year 2 have recovered to previous form."

Plenty of pitchers have surgeries in real life and by year 2 are selling insurance.

Posted by jc44 on 6/10/2015 9:38:00 PM (view original):
Yes they were all on 60 day DL.1 was on the 60 day to end the season and then tried 2 15 day stints at the start off the next season.(same injury just not recovered)
1 went from 81 to 78,1 from 82 to 78 and 1 from 78 to 74 after their recoveries.

Why did my players get better and yours get worse?

Once again the original point was they keep saying it isn`t about being realistic but about improving the simulation for users.Spending several seasons building a team and having injuries that not only hurt that season but for every season there after does not help any owner enjoy the process.Once again i understand the need for injuries but the recoveries should be better.New owners come in and can`t have training or medical over 14.How many do you think came in and were hit hard by injuries and said i`m not wasting money on this before they were around long enough to get hooked.and just left?If your trying to be realistic fine but if your trying to keep owners invested long term it isn`t good for business.

I wish i knew ,I`m not sure how to post players here but it is Johnny5Bench.Jared O`Keefe,Jerome Ray and Bubba Spencer

Yeah, we can only see current because we're not in the world and it was last season or before.   O'Keefe was the only one I saw but his last three transactions were DL.  So either he wasn't put on the 60 or he had two major injuries in one season.    Either way, yeah, he shouldn't be coming back at 100%.

HBD players get hurt FAR less the RL players. 

No O`Keefe is the one who got hurt for over 200 days at the end of season 24 and went on the 60 day.The start of season 25 he still hadn`t recovered so i tried putting him on the 15 twice before he was recovered to see if that helped get another bump but he only had 1 injury.They all had 1 injury and all went on the 60 day DL so i don`t know why it`s so different but i`ve had enough season ending injuries that have ruined seasons and wasted so much money building teams that i`m ready just put my money in fan duel instead.

Should have put him on the 60 to start S25.   He'd have gotten two injury recovery cycles and missed a dozen games.   He'd be better than he was.

Seriously, I can find half a dozen threads demanding WifS fix the injury "bug".    If you use the DL properly, your players will come back better 90% of the time.   It's not the injuries that are hurting you, it's your lack of knowledge on how to manipulate the DL to your advantage. 

Maybe but O`Keefe dropped 3 pts from 81 to 78.Ray and Spencer were on the 60 day and dropped even more (4 and 5) so what`s the difference between what i did and you did?
I understand that if a player has a 20 day injury and you put him on the 60 day he`ll get extra recovery bumps but when the injuries are 200 days i`m not sure what else you can do but put them on the 60 day DL.

I have limited information on what you did.   I have 20m in medical and I leave them on the 60 until I get two recovery cycles.   

But I don't have a problem with how injuries and recovery work. 

Do you believe the $20MM in medical has as much to do with it compared to $16 or $14 MM?

I think a 4m difference is pretty big. 

I haven't read all 24 pages of this post, but I am still trying to determine if there is any added benefit of having an ADV Scout budget after this release. I think maybe after the next release.

The new HOF voting is nice, but it would be nicer to see the number of votes received last season as one of the columns.