How about that..... Topic

too long
5/10/2013 2:01 PM
Here is the Cliff's Note Version:

"The current levels of carbon dioxide in the earth's atmosphere, approaching 400 parts per million, are low by the standards of geological and plant evolutionary history. Levels were 3,000 ppm, or more, until the Paleogene period (beginning about 65 million years ago). For most plants, and for the animals and humans that use them, more carbon dioxide, far from being a "pollutant" in need of reduction, would be a benefit. This is already widely recognized by operators of commercial greenhouses, who artificially increase the carbon dioxide levels to 1,000 ppm or more to improve the growth and quality of their plants."


5/10/2013 5:12 PM
5/16/2013 2:46 PM
No warming in 20 yrs. Models all wrong. Developing world won't stop spewing carbon.
5/16/2013 8:42 PM
KIng Tard gives his retard opinion from on high. 
5/16/2013 9:04 PM
5/17/2013 10:42 AM
dont confuse Swamp er Baker with facts Disco, you know he cant handle the truth!
5/17/2013 6:16 PM
Big pics so impressive. But not quite as impressive as all the models being wrong and those responsible or them having to explain.
5/17/2013 10:04 PM
yes, the 3% of climate papers that say you are right Baker really proves you are right.  Bravo Baker, you win the award for the worlds greatest cherry picker.  When only 24 of 13,950 climate articles reject global warming Id say your opinion is of the teeniest of tiny percentage.  Why dont you take a walk outside, tell me that its not different from what you remember when you were a kid.  Im not saying NOW exactly, but overall the past few years in general, would you not say its both warmer and dryer then when you were a kid?  I know it sure is in my area.  Especially dryer.
5/17/2013 10:10 PM
Posted by jclarkbaker on 5/17/2013 10:04:00 PM (view original):
Big pics so impressive. But not quite as impressive as all the models being wrong and those responsible or them having to explain.
We need to post big pics for you; it's obvious you can't comprehend the written word for ****.

5/18/2013 3:29 AM
No warming for 20 yrs. The vaunted models and circle jerk peer reviewed articles did not predict the same. Why?
5/19/2013 11:11 AM
Shut the window please!

I'm cold.
5/19/2013 12:14 PM (edited)
It's almost boring dominating you *******:

www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-22567023

5/20/2013 10:32 AM
Posted by jclarkbaker on 5/20/2013 10:32:00 AM (view original):
It's almost boring dominating you *******:

www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-22567023

another graduate of the Swamphawk#RIP school of reading comprehension...  do you even read beyond the headlines?

<<But when it comes to the longer term picture, the authors say their work is consistent with previous estimates. The IPCC said that climate sensitivity was in the range of 2.0-4.5C.>>

<<

Is there any succour in these findings for climate sceptics who say the slowdown over the past 14 years means the global warming is not real?

"None. No comfort whatsoever," he said.>>


5/20/2013 10:46 AM
So, let us see:

"Since 1998, there has been an unexplained "standstill" in the heating of the Earth's atmosphere."  So what I have been saying over and over again is true.  And the global warming lunatics on these boards continue to deny the same.

"The slowdown in the expected rate of global warming has been studied for several years now. Earlier this year, the UK Met Office lowered their five-year temperature forecast."  The admission the models were wrong.

"But long-term, the expected temperature rises will not alter significantly."  Translation:  we were wrong as ****, the models were wrong as ****, but we worship at the church of global warming crazies, so we are still right. 

Go ahead guys, believe it.  They now admit they've been wrong.  They have no ******* clue why, but they still think they're right.  And you dumb ***** believe them unquestioningly.



5/20/2013 11:16 AM
◂ Prev 1...17|18|19|20|21...28 Next ▸
How about that..... Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.