Posted by Trentonjoe on 10/1/2012 7:49:00 PM (view original):
Posted by dcy0827 on 10/1/2012 6:01:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Trentonjoe on 10/1/2012 5:03:00 PM (view original):
I don't think your speed/ath/defense are good enough. It should be much closer to 70/50/70.
Seeing as though I'm in three other D2 worlds that are currently playing right now, and NOT ONE D2 team in any of those three worlds can claim to hit all three of those benchmarks at the same time, maybe that's not the main problem?
Those numbers are hard to hit but they should be close if you want to be Final Four material. Here are some teams in knight that are close:
| |
School |
Players |
A |
SPD |
REB |
DE |
BLK |
LP |
PE |
BH |
P |
WE |
ST |
DU |
FT |
TOT |
| 1. |
Christian Brothers |
12 |
68 |
53 |
31 |
72 |
26 |
31 |
38 |
41 |
42 |
67 |
78 |
63 |
C+ |
611 |
| 2. |
Incarnate Word |
12 |
67 |
54 |
44 |
65 |
35 |
43 |
53 |
46 |
44 |
54 |
74 |
54 |
C |
633 |
| 3. |
Stonehill |
12 |
66 |
57 |
40 |
64 |
33 |
45 |
53 |
54 |
50 |
47 |
76 |
68 |
C+ |
654 |
| 4. |
N. Michigan |
12 |
65 |
57 |
36 |
65 |
25 |
46 |
45 |
51 |
46 |
64 |
77 |
68 |
C |
646 |
| 5. |
Grand Canyon |
12 |
65 |
47 |
54 |
66 |
43 |
38 |
39 |
44 |
46 |
63 |
73 |
54 |
C |
633 |
| 6. |
Paine |
12 |
63 |
54 |
41 |
61 |
36 |
49 |
39 |
42 |
33 |
55 |
79 |
54 |
C+ |
607 |
| 7. |
Harding |
12 |
63 |
57 |
40 |
63 |
34 |
32 |
35 |
42 |
37 |
52 |
79 |
66 |
C+ |
600 |
| 8. |
CSU, Bakersfield |
12 |
62 |
50 |
42 |
66 |
33 |
43 |
42 |
39 |
45 |
70 |
78 |
63 |
C |
632 |
| 9. |
Rollins |
12 |
62 |
51 |
36 |
65 |
25 |
39 |
38 |
44 |
44 |
58 |
70 |
60 |
C |
592 |
i agree with this sentiment, that you want to get close to those numbers to start hitting the national championship contender range. but i do agree with emy, i dont think thats a reasonable standard to expect of someone unless they were asking, "why didnt i win the national championship?" or something - why did i go under .500 against human coaches, i think thats too tough :) in tark, there were like 2 teams the last couple seasons who hit those metrics (although i really consider 60-65 speed top of the line, kind of tough to do with the great ath/def, but i think better speed with a little less ath/def would be fine, or visa versa). one won back to back championships, the other was my team, still amidst a defense switch, and we got the #1 overall seed both seasons. so i think its a little rough to use that standard unless its someone wondering why a team wasnt championship material, you have teams in the low 60s ath/def win d2 titles regularly, too.