Scouting is at 20

A             RF/LF (L/L)           Dur: 85  Hlth: 98  Pat: 57, MkU: 82

Con: 63, Pow: 98, VL: 75, VR: 79, Ey: 71, BR: 68, Spd: 70

 

B             SP (R/R)            Hlth: 99   Pat: 81, MkU: 81

DR: 30, Sta: 76, Con: 94, VL: 76, VR: 80, VC: 90, GB: 75, P1:76, P2:84, P3:61, P4: 52, P5: 39

 

C             SP (R/R)            Hlth: 98   Pat: 86, MkU: 79

DR: 29, Sta: 72, Con: 99, VL: 74, VR: 83, VC: 97, GB: 57, P1:87, P2: 75, P3:50, P4: 67, P5: 46

My leaning towards #3

2 and 3 very close; I'd lean 2 for the extra innings but again, what really matters is who's going to make his ratings.  1 is a nice player, also.

yeah I like the few extra IP and the higher GB on # 2.. 

# 2 is higher OVR proj'd

#2 86
#3 84

I actually like #3 a little better.  Neither one will quite meet the projected splits and somewhere in the 70's is nice I actually like the extra 5 points of control on #3.
 
My hunch is that they will have similar careers.  If you like to stack your infield with defense, perhaps #2 would get the edge.  I like 'em both.

B and C look very close.  What is their patience?  The difference of whether or not you get to keep them cheaply for their entire career could be the decisive factor.
A is going to be very good but not special enough as a COF to pass up a very good playoff rotation starter.

that is a great question and I should have looked at that to begin with... Of courese in this case they numbers are fairly equal...

I added them to the info above. 

yayyy free rickey scouting. Definitely pick the wrong guy, Will

#3!  Wouldn't think twice about it, assuming they were similar ages.

# 3 the P1 could make a big differance.